10th December 2007

75 percent of schools restrict student speech, report finds

The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education released its yearly report last week about the state of student speech on college campuses across the country. 

According to a FIRE press release,

 75 percent of schools surveyed maintain policies that clearly restrict speech that–outside the borders of campus–is protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 

FIRE issued the report after surveying nearly 350 college and universities nationwide, from Sept. 2006 to Sept. 2007.

Examples of speech restrictions the organization found include “maintaining unconstitutional speech codes,” punishing student journalists for the content they produce and regulating students’ online speech.

To read the full report, click here.  

posted in College Censorship, Resources | 0 Comments

10th December 2007

New Hampshire school says no to menorah display

Officials at the University of New Hampshire have rejected a request from a Jewish student organization to display a menorah in the student union building, on the grounds that the symbol would violate a campus “free speech area.”

Student activities director MaryAnne Lustgraaf told Ottaway Newspapers (Seacost Online) that

the request was rejected because it was proposed for a “free speech area.” It would be inappropriate in the public lobby, she said, citing the building’s mission to make students feel “safe and respected and comfortable.” She said other religious icons, such as a cross or nativity scene, would be rejected for the same reasons.

Jessica Rubinstein, co-chairwoman of the school’s chapter of Hillel, the organization that made the request for the menorah, told Seacost Online that the organization had held several events in the building, including a Hanukkah celebration last week. Hillel also has an office on the first floor of the building.

—–

Related:

posted in Art and Other Expression, College Censorship | 0 Comments

10th December 2007

California student arrested for online threats

The college gossip Web site Juicycampus.com is in the news again, after a student at Los Angeles’ Loyola Maramount University was arrested Dec. 8 for allegedly making threats on the site.

According to The Associated Press, LA police arrested student Carlos Huerta for:

posting a message that he would shoot and kill as many people as possible on campus before being killed himself by police, authorities said. The threat appeared on Juicycampus.com, a chat board that describes itself as having the “simple mission of enabling online anonymous free speech on college campuses.”

The threat of violence at LMU seems to be just one of many lately, and police and school administrators walk a fine line between protecting students and allowing them freedom of expression. If you’re interested in reading more, The First Amendment Center wrote a rather extensive article late last month in part about the legalities of reining in threatening student speech. Or you could check out this link to an editorial on student speech in a “Post Virginia Tech World.”

—–

Related:

posted in College Censorship, Internet speech | 0 Comments

10th December 2007

Penn State students spark controversy with Virginia Tech costumes

Some students at Pennsylvania State University have created outrage after pictures of them dressed as victims of the Virginia Tech massacre at a Halloween party surfaced on Facebook.com.

One student told WSLS-10, a local NBC affiliate, that the pair did it for the shock value, but also to make a statement.

“The thing is, everybody’s making a big stink about Virginia Tech. Virginia Tech was 32 deaths out of the 26 thousand that happen in America everyday. That’s the problem with college students. They all live in an ivory tower of privilege. They don’t understand, when it all boils down to it, it’s someone wearing a costume.”

Penn State issued a statement condemning the students’ costumes:

“Just because something is within the bounds of the Constitution and free speech, does not mean it should be undertaken. We certainly condemn these ugly and senseless actions. Most Penn Staters are as offended by this as anyone from Virginia Tech would be– and rightfully so. These two people do not represent 90,000 Penn State students. They represent themselves.”

—–

Related:

On this site:

posted in Art and Other Expression, Internet speech | 0 Comments

5th December 2007

Police arrest Wisconsin teacher for anonymous blog threats

A Milwaukee-area high school teacher was arrested last week after police alleged he made threatening comments on an online blog and referred to the shooters in the Columbine High School massacre.

James Buss, a teacher at Oak Creek High School, reportedly made the comments on the conservative Wisconsin political blog BootsandSabers.com. According to a story in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Buss posted anonymously under the pseudonym “The Observer,” writing:

“Looking at those teacher salary numbers in West Bend made me sick. … Weve (sic) got to get in back of the kids who have had enough of lazy, no good teachers and are fighting back. Kids like Eric Harris and Dylen Klebold (sic) members of the Young Republicans club at Columbine. They knew how to deal with the overpaid teacher union thugs. One shot at a time! Too bad the liberls (sic) rip them; they were heros (sic) and should be remembered that way.”

Some have argued that Buss, a former president of his district’s teachers’ union, made the comments sarcastically.

Larry Dupuis, legal director of The American Civil Liberties Union of Wisconsin, told The Associated Press:

“At worst, it was somebody expressing admiration for somebody who did something reprehensible. But the more reasonable explanation is this is somebody who is trying to mock the conservative view of teacher salaries.”

—–

Related:

On this site:

posted in Internet speech | 1 Comment

3rd December 2007

How to file a FOIA request

If you’re a regular reader, you may remember a post I did in October about a dean at Central Michigan University who slapped a student’s video camera while he taped himself giving her a Freedom of Information Act request.

FOIA requests don’t usually become that violent (you’ll understand after you watch the accompanying video in the above link), but they can cause controversy. Also, submitting FOIA requests can sometimes be confusing, especially for beginning journalists. Therefore, I made the above video instruction. Hopefully, it will help you out.

posted in Access, Resources, Student Media | 0 Comments

3rd December 2007

High school investigates teacher after 125 students walk out

A high school in Washington State has opened an inquiry after more than 100 students walked out of class in an Iraq war protest last month. The incident left one teacher on paid administrative leave, and a Socialist political Web site claims that a number of  First Amendment violations have occurred against students at the school since.

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reported that the teacher, who had left Tukwila, Wash.’s Foster High School with about 125 student protesters Nov. 16, has now returned to work. The P-I also reported that:

Students who brought notes from parents to participate in the walkout were excused, but others were not and could be considered truant or tardy.

However, political organization Socialist Alternative wrote that the school is investigating the actions of six teachers, and that the school’s principle

“threatened to suspend one student simply for talking about the threat their teachers are facing.”

Socialist Alternative also alleges that school administrators tore down students’ posters and brought in police Nov. 28 to “to disperse and break up a peaceful student meeting.”

—–

Related:

posted in Assembly, High School Censorship | 0 Comments

2nd December 2007

Connecticut university threatens student editor’s job

Administrators at Quinnipiac University in Hamden, Conn. have threatened to fire a student newspaper editor after he criticized a university policy that prohibits the newspaper from publishing stories online between print editions.

Quinnipiac officials made the threat after Jason Braff, editor of The Chronicle, wrote an editorial about the publication’s required online policy and gave an interview about it to a local newspaper, The New York Times reported Dec. 2. According to the Times,

The policy was established the previous school year, after the paper reported a story, about an off-the-court incident involving players on the men’s basketball team, first online.

Braff had argued publicly that the policy restricted the newspaper’s ability to report breaking news. But school administrators claimed the policy was meant to “reduce the potential for serious error in light of a student’s enthusiasm to release ‘breaking news.’”

Braff told the Times that he received a letter Nov. 2 from the school’s vice president and dean of students, Manuel C. Carreiro, threatening his job. The letter reportedly read in part:

“Please understand that any disregard for university or Student Center policies, or any public statement by you expressing disagreement with such policies, will seriously place your position and organization at risk with the university.”

If fired, Braff would likely lose an $8,000 stipend, or scholarship, he receives for his position on the paper.

Margarita E. Diaz, faculty adviser to The Chronicle, told the Times:

“Any attempt by the university to control the statements by any student leader, whether it is about university policies, or anything else going on on campus, I see as an attack on freedom of speech on campus.”

—-

Related blog articles:

posted in College Censorship, Internet speech, Student Media | 1 Comment

1st December 2007

Student sues Pat Robertson, Regent University over Facebook suspension

The Regent University law student who was suspended for posting a satirical photograph on Facebook of the university’s chancellor, televangelist Pat Robertson, has sued both the university and Robertson.

Adam M. Key filed the lawsuit Nov. 29, after he was suspended in October for posting the picture, which showed Robertson scratching his face with his middle finger. Key reportedly took the photo as a freeze-frame from a YouTube.com video of Robertson doing an interview.

According to an Associated Press story:

Regent officials said the posting violated standards of conduct that prohibit the display of obscene material outside an academic context. The school suspended Key pending a mental health evaluation after he refused to publicly apologize for the posting or successfully defend it in a legal brief.

AP reported that the suit seeks to clear Key’s disciplinary record, as well as unspecified damages, and that:

Because the private university receives federal funds, it is required under the U.S. Higher Education Act to respect students’ freedom of religion and expression.

—-

Related:

posted in College Censorship, Court Cases, Internet speech | 0 Comments

1st December 2007

Months after “Don’t tase me, bro!”, UF students arrested at Alberto Gonzales speech

The University of Florida has had to walk “an uncomfortable tightrope” since its infamous “Don’t tase me bro!” incident last September, when campus police used a stun gun to subdue a relentless questioner during a speech given by former presidential candidate John Kerry.

The school just last week hosted former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, who was met by protesters that wore “hoods reminiscent of detainees” and jumped onto the stage beside him, according to The Gainsville Sun. The students were arrested during the speech.

The Sun reported that the school has since stepped up security, noting that for an immigration debate this week,

“a barrier was placed between audience members and the stage, and event organizers were strategically placed to fill any porous spots where someone might try to rush the stage. Signs in front of the Reitz Union Grand Ballroom where the debate was held declared that bags and banners wouldn’t be allowed. And while uniformed police officers were few in number, the chief of UF’s police force was in the audience wearing a blue windbreaker and jeans.”

The debate concluded without incident, the Sun reported, but the extra measures are indicative of the tense atmosphere at times on campus.

“UF officials are always walking an uncomfortable tightrope when it comes to hosting controversial speakers. There are sometimes competing efforts to preserve audience members’ rights of free speech while also ensuring civil dialogue isn’t disrupted by protesters storming a stage.”

—-

Related:

posted in College Censorship | 0 Comments